Two FBI agents were killed and three more injured executing a search warrant back in 2021. The agents were investigating a child pornography ring. Who did the shooting? Don’t know the article doesn’t say. The current story points out that authorities in Australia have rounded up nineteen suspects as an outgrowth of the investigation that led to the deaths of the FBI agents. Am I missing something?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/98-arrested-child-sex-abuse-164900181.html
An additional forty-three have already been convicted. All of these in Australia. Check my addition, 19 + 43 = 62. Where are the other thirty-seven? I am familiar with FBI math, also known as double dipping. Every agency involved in an investigation claims credit. Three agencies arrest one suspect on one charge how many arrests occurred. If you said one, you would be wrong. The answer is three, three arrests, three charges. Always round up.
That’s just business as usual. How come no American suspects were identified, including the original shooter? Do I detect a lack of curiosity? Pedophile is such an ugly word. Substitute minor attracted and make it all better. But, but minor attracted people who network, (also known as criminal conspiracy) and then shoot FBI agents upset the narrative. Five agents shot as they make entry to the house. Could it be that this minor attracted person used an assault rifle? Nothing to see here, move along. I suspect there is a simple explanation.
John Griffin pleaded guilty to enticement of a minor and faces at least 10 years in prison. A former CNN producer pleaded guilty to a child sex charge Monday for sexually assaulting a 9-year-old girl after luring her to his Vermont ski house.
The explanation is called Professional courtesy. Be a critical reader, read the story, then look between the lines.
