Governing Chinese Take Out Style

I am kind of all over the place with this one.  By that I mean the seemingly unconnected events, movements, philosophies are in actuality pointed towards the same destination.  Some of the reason may be shear opportunism, the left will steal unashamedly even if what they’ve stolen doesn’t fit comfortably within their agenda.  

First we have a segment of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) clowns that believe and blame Israel for U.S. police shootings of blacks.  It’s a real magical mystery tour to trace BLM from its inception to the present incarnation.  The original organizers were lesbians and transgenders affiliated with Mizzou who complained that college was too hard and too inclusive they needed more ghetto or some such shit to feel at home. Then they hitched on to those black males who demonstrated nothing but incompetence during their short lives. These guys had the misfortune to demonstrate they weren’t any better at crime than anything else they attempted and were killed by police for their efforts. Say after me “DO NOT BRING A KNIFE TO A GUN FIGHT” Somehow from here we windup with co-mingling the fate of one terrorist organization BLM for another Hamas.

Another example is the Sierra Club.  They oppose lights and walls along the Rio Grande, as being harmful to wildlife and disruptive to immigration patterns.  I thought the purpose of the wall was to disrupt the local immigration patterns.  

There seems to be this modern misconception that the law is to be read like a Chinese menu, take something from column A and then something from column B and substitutions are always welcome for fifty cents more.  That is not the way it works.

In 1794, President Washington led 13,000 militia troops to put down a violent protest against a tax on whiskey, which was an important source of income for Western settlers in the Appalachians. He did so on the grounds that, while the grievance was legitimate, “if the laws are to be so trampled upon with impunity, and a minority…is to dictate to the majority, there is an end put at one stroke to republican government…, for some other man or society may dislike another law and oppose it with equal propriety until all laws are prostrate, and everyone will carve for himself.”

But the reason Washington could put down this insurrection so easily is because he had the moral authority to do so. As a man who had staked everything on the American Revolution, who had voluntarily relinquished power several times before, he had a reputation for unwavering dedication to the cause of liberty. He had a unique moral authority to speak to the rebels and to their supporters, and to demand that they disperse. sheriff-clarke-is-right-theres-a-war-on-cops/

Washington knew that just as the citizens have an obligation to follow the law, the government has an obligation to enforce it.  For the Government to turn a blind eye to one statute, whether flawed or not, gives license for another group to ignore a law not to their liking.  It is only through the even handed application of the law that unjust laws are identified and repealed.